'Generative AI is the first tool to threaten the continued existence of writing.'

So much interesting stuff in this article from The Atlantic - absolutely worth settling in and reading the whole thing. However, these are the bits I digitally underlined:

‘According to the National Endowment for the Arts, which conducts the most comprehensive survey of the nation’s reading habits, fewer than half of all adults reported having read a book of any kind in 2022’

‘And yet, strangely, Americans are probably reading more words than ever before. What has changed is what they read, and how. People are bombarded with emails, text messages, X posts, Reddit threads, Instagram captions. This explosion of textual fragments has come at the expense of devoting sustained attention to longer written works that convey rich and complicated information. Maryanne Wolf, a cognitive neuroscientist at UCLA, argues that people are losing the ability to think deeply about writing. That doesn’t mean they are forgetting how to decode individual words. Rather, they are losing the higher-order abilities of comprehension and synthesis. America, in other words, isn’t illiterate. It’s postliterate.’

‘Rennix told me that some students now view reading as an unnecessarily burdensome way of acquiring knowledge. “By asking them to read,” she said, “professors are arbitrarily withholding information from students by forcing them to get it through this more difficult medium.”’

‘Now entertainment is limitless. There’s no hard stop—one show bleeds into the next. People watch TV with their phone in hand, monitoring social media or texting with friends. Netflix has reportedly told directors and screenwriters to assume that the audience isn’t paying attention and to constantly remind viewers what’s going on. In this environment, people have to be really determined to read. Most aren’t.’

‘But what if you consistently replace one kind of action (reading a word) with another (watching an Instagram Reel)? One of the most robust findings in neuroscience is that people’s brains master what they practice. If we fill our time with short-form videos instead of books, our reading skills atrophy. We have less background knowledge to aid comprehension. There’s no danger of spontaneous mass illiteracy, but the complex cognitive skills that reading fosters start to degrade. The library of the mind falls into disrepair.’

‘A number of digital technologies have hijacked attention and made focused reading all but impossible. Generative AI is the first tool to threaten the continued existence of writing. Writing is hard. Orwell likened the experience to a “long bout of some painful illness.” AI promises a simple remedy. The trouble is that writing is not merely the act of transcribing fully formed thoughts—if it were, it wouldn’t be hard. Writing is the way people figure out what they think, and how to convey those thoughts to someone who doesn’t already share them.’

‘The skill of deep thinking will likely become rarer and rarer in a world where much of the population uses AI to avoid writing. It will also become more and more important. AI is creating a superabundance of text. It has led to a threefold increase in the number of books released on Amazon each month since 2022, when ChatGPT was launched. Over the same period, scientific-journal submissions have also surged. Many were written at least in part by artificial intelligence.’

The End of Reading Is Here, Rose Horowitch

Durable Content Credentials: creating trust in content in the age of AI

I found this interesting initiative via Ash Mann’s newsletter - Durable Content Credentials prove how content was created, where it came from, and its editing history, as well of improving trust and accuracy in the age of AI slop.

There are three parts to the credentials:

  1. Secure metadata (C2PA-signed data on how content was made)
  2. Invisible watermarking (hidden identifiers that survive screenshots or rebroadcasting),
  3. Fingerprinting (a perceptual match against stored credentials).

Durable content credentials

"I was talking to a fundraiser who said they used AI and they doubled their annual appeal revenues from $50K to $100K. Well, is your 50k in additional funds worth the $300K's worth of environmental and other forms of damage and trauma to communities?

Some important questions that nonprofits and charities (and all orgs, TBH) should ask themselves about their use of AI. I really appreciate the way Vu has captured all the difficult questions that many of us skip over when we use AI.

How we are harming marginalized communities.

How we are traumatizing people, especially women of color in poorer countries.

How we may be supporting fascism without realizing it

How we are contributing to the entrenchment of racism and white supremacy.

How we are destroying the livelihoods of artists

How we’re creating a more egotistical, sycophantic, narcissistic society

How we are enshittifying ourselves and our world.

How we may be perpetuating the injustice that we are trying to fight:

We need to have much more serious conversations about AI and the nonprofit/philanthropic sector, Vu Le

'The internet you grew up on isn't dying. A commercial veneer glued on top of it is.'

This is so, so, good:

“The places you spent your younger years are gone or unrecognizable, and the places you use now are visibly straining under a flood of machine-generated text nobody asked for. There is a low ambient grief about it, and a faint guilt, something like:

“I should be doing something. I should be somewhere else. I want the old thing back.”

I want to tell you a thing that I think is true, and that I think will make you feel better.

The internet is not dying.

A commercial veneer glued on top of it is dying.

The layer where every human activity became a venture-backed destination, every destination became a feed, every feed became ad inventory, and every ad market became a machine for producing more things to interrupt you with.

Underneath that layer is another internet: older, slower, less polished, harder to monetize, and much harder to kill.

It is not utopia. It is full of spam, abandoned servers, broken clients, hostile nodes, strange old commands, half-maintained software, and people arguing in plain text about things no normal person should care about.

But it has one enormous advantage over the platforms that replaced it in your imagination.

No one owns it.”

The Boring Internet, Terry Godier

The internet is being rebuilt for machines - Rebecca Bellan

“Cloud infrastructure has long been designed around humans who search, click, scroll, and stream in a steady and predictable fashion. AI agents behave differently. They can unleash a swell of activity, spinning up multiple sub-agents that query hundreds of databases, search documents, and call APIs in seconds and then disappear as quickly as they arrived.

Under that premise, Amazon is redesigning a core piece of its cloud infrastructure. On Thursday, AWS launched its next generation of OpenSearch Serverless, a fully managed search and vector database — essentially a system for storing and retrieving information at scale — that’s designed specifically for agentic workloads.”

The internet is being rebuilt for machines, Rebecca Bellan

AI is a political project: Karen Hao

A great interview with Karen Hao from Carole Cadwalladr.

This quote gave me horror chills:

" AI, as it is currently conceived by Silicon Valley, is a political project, and the central feature of this political project is to take agency away from people to ultimately make these entities, the empires, the monopolies on decision-making power in the world, if they can convince everyone that this is inevitable. “Don’t do anything about it,” you know, “just lie back and let it wash over you”. They have achieved their goal, which is to make sure that people don’t feel any ownership over their life, their data, their land, their resources, and their future any more."

‘It’s not progress, and we can stop it’: journalist Karen Hao on big tech, protest and the preventable AI future

Karen Hao's AI Resist List

I was extremely excited to see this in my feed this morning from Karen Hao:

“On the one-year anniversary of EMPIRE OF AI, I am so, so excited to announce The AI Resist List, a new project that documents examples of resistance to the AI empires around the world: airesistlist.org.

Inspired by Choose Democracy’s Resist List against authoritarianism, the AI Resist List organizes resistance movements based on how they pressure different “Pillars of Support” that uphold and perpetuate the empires. Thus far it includes roughly 30 examples that span countries and contexts, highlighting a diversity of actions that range from the individual to institutional, from the artistic to the political. It also showcases eight examples of “Possible Futures,” projects already dreaming up and building alternatives to Silicon Valley’s extractive, corrosive vision of AI development.

The List underscores how the current trajectory of AI is not inevitable. Resistance is blossoming everywhere, and anyone can shape the future of AI development. Amid an onslaught of negative news, this project centers hope.”

The Pillars of Support is a really interesting concept. They are:

  1. Narrative
  2. Funding
  3. Data
  4. Data Centers
  5. Resource Extraction
  6. Labor
  7. Adoption
  8. Surveillance
  9. Policy

It’s also a lovely site to look at, with some beautiful illustrations.

The AI Resist List

Text in large letters spells out THE AI RESIST LIST with colorful and abstract designs inside the letters.

Refuse Surveillance. Syndicate

A booklet titled Refuse Surveillance Syndicate is resting on a cutting mat near a keyboard, advocating for an RSS revival.

I made a mini zine about why it’s time for an RSS revival (I know, I know, it never went away). Download it, print it, and then follow these instructions to fold it and cut it and make it ready to read.

Download the mini zine as a PDF

Alternatively, you can just read it here:

What is RSS?

An RSS feed is a file a website keeps updated with its latest content. An RSS reader collects those files, checking for new entries so you don’t have to. You probably already use something like this — open your podcast app. Every show you follow, every new episode, in chronological order. That’s RSS. Point a reader at any site with an RSS feed and it all lands in one place. Your own curated feed of content.

RSS: a brief history

RSS launched in 1999 and by the mid-2000s it was genuinely cool — a single place to follow everything you cared about on a busy, ever-expanding web. Then Facebook and Twitter came along. Publishers chased traffic to those platforms and built their audiences there instead. Why maintain a feed when the algorithm could do it for you? (RIP Google Reader, 2005–2013. The beginning of the end.)

The web got worse. RSS didn’t.

Social feeds promised to do what RSS did, but better. Then they enshittified — choked with ads, shaped by algorithms, optimised for engagement over everything else. RSS never did any of that. It just got on with it.

And it never went away. RSS is still here, quietly waiting for the hype cycle to turn. And it might be the best antidote to the enshittified web we’ve got. Because what RSS offers sounds pretty idyllic right now:

  • Control. You choose what’s in your feed. No platform decides for you.
  • Curation. No ads. No algorithm. Chronological order, always.
  • Anonymity. Read whatever you want. Nobody’s watching. No ad will follow you around after you’ve read something sensitive (or embarrassing).

Where to start

Getting started is simple. Find an RSS reader app, search for sites you want to follow, and subscribe to their feed. That’s it.

These are some popular options:

Try one, switch if it doesn’t feel right — your feeds are portable, so you’re never locked in. If a site you want to follow doesn’t have a feed, create one with a tool like fetchrss.com

Publish something? Give your readers a feed.

Your readers shouldn’t have to follow your work across platforms. A feed gives them one place to find you, on their terms — not the algorithm’s. If your site doesn’t have one, it’s straightforward to add. Most publishing platforms support it natively — including WordPress. It’s also worth knowing: AI agents are increasingly using RSS to find and read structured content. Even the robots want your feed.

Tracey Emin on AI

‘The problem with AI is it’s not about the arts or creativity or anything like that, it’s to do with truth. That’s the major problem for everybody in every possible field. We no longer know what truth is.’